Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Ala. App. 548 - Huggins v. State

41 Ala. App. 548 - Huggins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably State v. Hudson (1971), United States v. Cartlidge (1987)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

100196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 52 Cal. 2d 142 - People v. Camodeca · Lee v. State · Hutto v. State · Huggins v. State · Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person who has carnal knowledge of any girl under twelve years of age, or abuses such girl in the attempt to have carnal knowledge of her, shall, on conviction, be punished, at the discretion of the jury, either by death or by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than ten years.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The requisite actus reus need only be, indeed can only be, some deed short of consummation, e.g., falling short or wide of the goal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.