Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 ALAAPP 659 - Ferrell v. State

Ferrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1985

7 state decisions

50196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sorrell v. State · Barnett v. State · Boddie v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If Smith and Lane are not in complicity with Ferrell and Kirby, there is no field of operation for Code 1940, T. 15, § 307. It would be otherwise if Smith and Lane’s own testimony admitted their guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.