Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 App. D.C. 183

Enquist v. Didden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 1, 1913

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · decided 1913-12-01

Hearing on an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia entered upon motion by the plaintiffs for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in an action to recover rent alleged to he due and owing under a lease of premises occupied by defendant.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1913-12-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2010

2 state decisions

1019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Robb

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court:

¶2This case differs from the preceding one only in the fact that another instalment of rent is here sought to be recovered. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in the preceding case, the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.

/41/appdc/183 · .json · Public domain