In Re Midwest Processing Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2016
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 303 · 11 U.S.C. § 305
Relies on In Re All Media Properties, Inc. · Mason v. Integrity Insurance · Matter of Luftek, Inc. · Matter of 7H Land & Cattle Co. · In re Crown Sportswear, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) by three or more entities, each of which is either a holder of a claim against such person that is not contingent as to liability ... if such claims aggregate at least $5,000.00 more than the value of any lien on property of the debtor securing such claims held by the ... [Petitioners]; (2) if there are fewer than 12 such holders, ..., by one or more such holders that hold in the aggregate at least $5000.00 of such claims;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.