Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Conn. Super. Ct. 100 - Lownds v. Lownds

41 Conn. Super. Ct. 100 - Lownds v. Lownds’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2010

19 state decisions

1101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bozzi v. Bozzi · Guille v. Guille · Olean v. Treglia · Papcun v. Papcun · Marcil v. Marcil

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Laches consists of two elements. First, there must have been a delay that was inexcusable, and, second, that delay must have prejudiced the defendant. . . . The mere lapse of time does not constitute laches . . . unless it results in prejudice to the defendant . . . as where, for example, the defendant is led to change his position with respect to the matter in question.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Equitable estoppel is the effect of the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is absolutely precluded, both at law and in equity, from asserting rights which might perhaps have otherwise existed . . . as against another person, who has in good faith relied upon such conduct and has been led thereby to change his position for the worse. . . . Its two essential elements are that one party must do or say something which is intended or calculated to induce another to believe in the existence of certain facts to act on that belief, and that the other party, influenced thereby, must change his position or do some act to his injury which he otherwise would not have done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.