Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 DELCH 14 - Bennett v. Propp

Bennett v. Propp’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2019

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

140196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 30 Del. Ch. 538 - Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp. · Kors v. Carey · Yasik v. Harry Wachtel & Diamond State Brewery, Inc. · Kaufman v. Shoenberg · Andersen v. Albert & J. M. Anderson Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the inherent danger in the purchase of shares with corporate funds to remove a threat to corporate policy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(t)he directors are of necessity confronted with a conflict of interest”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the purchases were made to preserve management control”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.