Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.2d 336 - Traiman v. Rappaport

Traiman v. Rappaport’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.2d 336 · 1930

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
7
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Simmons v. California Institute of Technology (1949), 127 Wash. 2d 256 - Boyd v. Davis (1995)

6 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

60193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Franklin v. Matoa Gold Min. Co. · 99 N.J. Eq. 14 - Partridge v. Cummings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a contract is entire or divisible depends very largely on its terms and on the intention of the parties disclosed by its terms. As a general rule a contract is entire when by its terms, nature and purpose, it contemplates and intends that each and all of its parts are interdependent and common to one another and to the consideration.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.