Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 F.2d 523

Docket No. 185.

Willis v. Scott

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1930.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1930-06-11

4 counsel of record

Relies on Willis v. Scott

Decided 1930-06-11

¶1For former opinion, see 40 F.(2d) 330.

¶2Guy H. Sigler and H. A. Ledbetter, both of Ardmore, Okl. (H. E. Ledbetter and P. M. Jackson, both of Ardmore, Okl., on the brief), for appellant.

¶3Philos S. Jones, of Muskogee, Okl. (Frank Lee, of Muskogee, Okl., on the brief), for appellees McMillan and Buddrus.

¶4F. M. Adams, of Ardmore, Okl. (Adams So Orr, of Ardmore, Okl., Marion W. Roily, of Meridian, Miss., and Earl Richardson, of Philadelphia, Miss., on the brief), for appellee Scott.

¶5W. F. Semple, of Durant, Okl. (A. H. Ferguson, of Durant, Okl., on the brief), for appellee Willis.

¶6Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.

¶7COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

¶8It is asserted in the petition for a rehearing that our opinion erroneously states Lilly Tubby and Feliah Jim Willis pleaded to the bill in the trial court. The record shows the only pleadings of these parties were their responses filed in the county court of Carter county. The correction is made. However, the interests of these parties were not involved, and our decision is in no wise affected by the fact.

¶9We are not persuaded that there was error in our determination of this ease.

¶10The petition for rehearing is therefore denied.

/41/f2d/523 · .json · Public domain