Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.2d 586 - Brandon v. Holman

Brandon v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.2d 586 · 1930

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1991

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

601930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Surety Co of New York v. Pauly · A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co. · National Bank v. Insurance Co. · Travellers' Insurance v. McConkey · Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was the duty of the judge below, under the circumstances, to direct a verdict for the plaintiff. The rule laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States is that a verdict should be directed when the evidence given at the trial, with all inferences that the jury could justifiably draw from it, leads to but one conclusion. Delk v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., 220 U. S. [580] 587, 31 S. Ct. 617 , 55 L. Ed. 590; A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co., 267 U. S. 248 , 45 S. Ct. 300 , 69 L. Ed. 597 . This court has repeatedly held to the same effect. Anderson v. Southern Ry. Co. (C. C. A.) 20 F. (2d) 71; Lamborn v. Woodard (C. C. A.) 20 F. (2d) 635; Flannagan v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 22 F. (2d) 136; Lyon v. Travelers’ Protective Ass’n of America [C. C. A.) 25 F. (2d) 596; Livingston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. (C. C. A.) 28 F. (2d) 563; Standard Oil Co. v. Cates (C. C. A.) 28 F. (2d) 718. The court below properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and the judgment is accordingly Affirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.