In re Cohan’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.2d 632 · 1930
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1957
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re H. Magen Co. · In re Sax · Hirsch v. Schilling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The main dispute in law arises on the bankrupt’s assignment of error that the order is invalid because made in the alternative that he turn over goods or the proceeds of their sale.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harbaugh v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.