Wilson v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.2d 704 · 1930
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably United States ex rel. Robinson v. Day (1931), United States ex rel. Meyer v. Day (1931)
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 87 Cal. App. 482 - People v. Jones · United States ex rel. Ulrich v. Kellogg · Tillinghast v. Edmead · Bendel v. Nagle · Bartos v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the [deportation] order is void on its face for want of jurisdiction, it is the duty of this and every other court to disregard it.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no sentence ha[d] been pronounced for the crime charged, and no sentence [would] follow in the future, provided he fulfill[ed] all the terms and conditions of the probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“confer[ed] no express authority upon the court to again commit him[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.