In re Clinton’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.2d 749 · 1930
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
July 2000
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2000
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Eisenberg · In re Funk · In re Holmes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.