Von Rosen v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.2d 982 · 1930
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 1976 · most notably Hartman v. Lubar (1942), Simmons v. Central Charge Service, Inc. (1970)
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reagan v. District of Columbia · 30 App. D.C. 576 - Brown v. Slocum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There could be no usurious interest collected until the appellee had paid the full amount she received, together with legal interest. This time did not occur until within less than a year of the bringing of this suit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knott v. Jackson“might recover one-fourth of the great principal sum as is undertaken to be done in this case. Such cases are plainly covered by the sections of the Code already referred to.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“small bonus for an extension in the payment of interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.