Light’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2022
3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Honig v. Doe · Davis v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers · Fleming v. Kemp, Warden · In re Martin-Trigona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“stay-put provision ensures an uninterrupted continuity of education for a disabled child pending administrative [or judicial] resolution,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Special Education and Individually Marcia Harding, in Her Official Capacity as Acting Associate Director, Special Education and Individually Mike Crowley, in His Official Capacity as Administrator for Special Education Monitoring and Technical Assistance and Individually Williford School District 39, Its Superintendent and Board, Respectively Bruce Evans, in His Official and Individual Capacities Clinton Madison, in His Official and Individual Capacities Rodney Despain, in His Official and Individual Capacities Jeff Goings, in His Official and Individual Capacities Don Coggins, in His Official and Individual Capacities Eddie Gray, in His Official and Individual Capacities · 39““Under the IDEA, parents are entitled to notice of proposed changes in their child’s educational program and, where disagreements arise, to an ‘impartial due process hearing.’ [ 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(2).] Once the available avenues of administrative review have been exhausted, aggrieved parties to the dispute may file a civil action in state or federal court. Id. § 1415(e)(2).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.