Hall v. Delo’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.3d 1248 · 1994
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Yagow v. United States · Anderson v. Harless · Jones v. Jerrison · Kennedy v. Delo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal habeas review is barred when a federal claim has not been `fairly presented' to the state court for a determination on the merits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In Missouri, a motion to recall the mandate is proper only when a state prisoner alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective or argues that the appellate court's opinion directly conflicts with a decision of the United States Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Neal II v. Delo“rest[ed] [its decision] on a state law ground that is independent of the federal question and adequate to support the judgment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.