Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.3d 1294 - Lansdowne v. Cox

Lansdowne v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.3d 1294 · 1994

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Cacioli Dan v. A, Searles v. Riley (In Re Searles) (2004)

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

280199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Gleason v. Thaw · Meridian Bank v. Alten · Britton v. Price · Cox v. Lansdowne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the debtor failed to maintain and preserve adequate records, and (2) that such failure makes it impossible to ascertain the debtor's financial condition and material business transactions.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the debtor has concealed, destroyed, mutilated, falsified, or failed to keep or preserve any recorded information, including books, documents, records, and papers, from which the debtor's financial condition or business transactions might be ascertained, unless such act or failure to act was justified under all the circumstances of the case.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(3) the debtor has concealed, destroyed, mutilated, falsified, or failed to keep or preserve any recorded information, including books, documents, records, and papers, from which the debtor’s financial condition or business transactions might be ascertained, unless such act or failure to act was justified under all of the circumstances .of the case;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.