Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.3d 167 - Rowland v. Perry

Rowland v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.3d 167 · 1994

Citation profile

152
cited by 152 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 152 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. (2001), Lennon v. Miller (1995)

57 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

5601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subjective factors involving the officer's motives, intent, or propensities are not relevant.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]rtificial divisions in the sequence of events”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.