Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.3d 571 - Doe v. Bagan

Doe v. Bagan’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.3d 571 · 1994

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
3
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 7 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co. (1995), Bauchman v. West High School (1997)

23 federal appellate · 7 district · 9 state decisions

2501994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To state a valid cause of action under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege the deprivation by defendant of a right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States while the defendant was acting under color of state law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Plaintiffs have offered no evidence to suggest that the interview with Bagan involved any of the raiments of arrest or approached the potentiality for compulsion with which the Court was concerned in Miranda .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is obvious, however, that Doe was not denied his right to public education. He was only denied his request to attend the public school of his choice. Plaintiffs cite no Colorado authority, and we have found none, indicating that the right to a public education encompasses a right to choose one’s particular school.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.