United States v. Levine’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.3d 607 · 1994
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably United States v. McCullah (1996), United States v. Evans (2001)
33 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Burks v. United States · Blum v. Stenson · Russello v. United States · Stirone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“accept the jury's resolution of conflicting evidence and its assessment of the credibility of witnesses.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to such risk,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.