Leisher v. Conrad’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.3d 753 · 1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Remmer v. United States · Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Russell v. United States · Hobson v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a proper request [for a hearing] is made, questioning of the jury foreman alone will likely not be sufficient to ensure that any prejudice has been dispelled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.