Goetz v. Crosson’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.3d 800 · 1994
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp. (2004), Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp. (1998)
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Mathews v. Eldridge · Ake v. Oklahoma · Addington v. Texas · Vitek v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he inner workings of administrative decision making processes are almost never subject to discoveryf,] ... the inner workings of decision making by courts are kept in even greater confidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when the action taken was improvident and affected the substantial rights of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.