Bossett v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
41 F.3d 825 · 1994
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 204 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional Facility (2001), Thomas Garcia v. Hazel Lewis Hale Creek Correctional Facility (1999)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bruton v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Rose v. Lundy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 204 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State; or (B)(i) there is an absence of available State corrective process; or (ii) circumstances exist that render such process ineffective to protect the rights of the applicant.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“habeas corpus relief if it is found that upon the record evidence adduced at the trial no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 324 (1979). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, id. at 319, and determine”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.