Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.3d 844 - United States v. Griffiths

United States v. Griffiths’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.3d 844 · 1994

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
December 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2011

9 federal appellate ·

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Fussell v. Price · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Wade v. Shook · United States v. Mobley · United States v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The government reasonably may determine that stolen firearms often end up in the hands of criminals, thus warranting a rule that imposes on the recipient of a firearm the burden of ensuring that the firearm is not stolen. In addition, the enhancement, which traditionally has been considered by sentencing courts, does not create a separate substantive offense calling for a separate penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Further, the government has a legitimate interest in punishing possession of a stolen firearm and placing the burden upon one who receives a firearm to ensure that the possession is lawful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “§ 2K2.1(b)(4), as construed in § 2K2.1, comment (n. 19), does not violate the due process clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.