Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 F.3d 9 - Tatro v. Kervin

Tatro v. Kervin’s Empirical Analysis

41 F.3d 9 · 1994

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 24 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Provencher v. CVS Pharmacy, Division of Melville Corp. (1998), Mendocino Environmental Center v. Mendocino County (1999)

33 federal appellate · 24 district · 4 state decisions

3101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Massachusetts District Court)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Hunter v. Bryant · Brewster v. Derwinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a tendency to confuse or mislead the jury with respect to the applicable principles of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[c]lear' has been defined as '[o]bvious beyond reasonable doubt,' and 'clear and convincing proof' has been described as 'proof beyond a reasonable, i.e., a well-founded doubt' or else as 'more than a preponderance but less than is required in a criminal case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “two dramatically conflicting versions of the events [which] required the jury to ascribe to either one version or the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.