Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 F. App'x 680

United States v. Desanges

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-07-25

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Omar Yusuf Desanges seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as un *681 timely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Desanges, Nos. CR-95-46; CA-02-126-7 (W.D.Va. May 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/41/fappx/680 · .json · Public domain