Boyd v. Baskerville

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-07-25

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Barry Allen Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Boyd v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-347-7 (W.D.Va. Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.