Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 FRD 152 - Hikel v. Abousy

Hikel v. Abousy’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
6
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2000

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

5019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Buffington v. Wood · Buining v. the Transporter · Knighton v. Villian & Fassio e Compagnia Internazionale di Genova Societe Riuniti di Navigazione · Leszynski v. Russ

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no cause to complain of surprise if defendants elect to disprove the case on trial instead of in the conference room”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.