Kaminsky v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2014
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Turner v. Louisiana · DePinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance · Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc. · Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In any event, the liberal standards upon which amendments are to be granted when leave of the Court is required under Rule 15(a) should guide the Court on motions to add parties under Rule 21.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.