Bazuaye v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 19 U.S.C. § 1600 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1607 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1609 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1615 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Richards v. United States
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.