Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 FSUPP2D 960 - In Re Texas Prisoner Litigation

In Re Texas Prisoner Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of the privileges of conducting activities within the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protection of its laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.