41 F. Supp. 2d 965 - Baker v. Stone County, Mo.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2015
2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 255 · 29 U.S.C. § 260 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Malley v. Briggs · Carnegie v. United States · Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · National League of Cities v. Usery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) has the power to hire and fire the employee; 2) supervises and controls the employee’s work schedule or conditions of employment; 3) determines the rate and method of payment; and 4) maintains employment records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.