¶11. In each of the two special grounds of the motion for a new trial it is alleged that an excerpt from the charge was “erroneous and injurious to him [the defendant], and was contrary to law and misleading, because in such charge (a) the court charged on an issue not *371sustained by proof; (6) the court charged on a contention or theory not sustained by the evidence.” Both grounds are without merit, as the evidence authorized the charge given.
¶22. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.
¶3Judgment affirmed.