Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 HAW 442 - Kamanus. v. E.E. Black, Ltd.

Kamanus. v. E.E. Black, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2010

1 district · 15 state decisions

501956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co. · Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co. · Argonne Co. v. Hitaffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not regard the Common Law of England as being in force here eo nomine and as a whole. Its principles and provisions are in force so far as they have been expressly, or by necessary implication, incorporated into our laws by enactment of the Legislature; or have been adopted by the rulings of the Courts of Record; or have become a part of the common law of this Kingdom by universal usage; but no farther.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.