41 Ill. App. 3d 154 - Green v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently April 2003 · most notably 57 Ill. App. 3d 578 - Gasperini v. Gasperini (1978), 96 Ill. App. 3d 1108 - In Re Marriage of Brophy (1981)
73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 40 Ill. 2d 344 - Hoffmann v. Hoffmann · 22 Ill. App. 3d 1045 - Kaufman v. Kaufman · 30 Ill. 2d 440 - Canady v. Canady · 59 Ill. 2d 61 - Flynn v. Kucharski · 28 Ill. 2d 347 - Rodely v. Rodely
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The award of alimony in either form must be ‘fit, reasonable and just’ (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 40, par. 19) as between both parties, and if alimony in gross is awarded, the award must be equitable between both parties. As stated in Busby v. Busby (1973), 11 Ill. App. 3d 426, 430-31 , 296 N.E.2d 585 , ‘An award of alimony should not be made so high as to cause financial difficulties and personal embarrassment on the part of the husband # # # > ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““As used in the Divorce Act, ‘residence’ thus denotes ‘permanent abode.’ It is the place one considers as ‘home.’ Of paramount importance in determining whether a given place is or is not one’s residence is the intent of that person to live there as his permanent home. [Citations.]” ( 107 Ill. App. 2d 311, 314 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.