Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 Kan. 492

Peacock v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1889-01-15

<p>Petition in Error — Review. A general jury finding, based on disputed facts and conflicting testimony, and being approved by the district court, will not be disturbed.</p>

Decided 1889-01-15

Per Curiam:

¶1Action to recover upon a promissory note and to foreclose a land contract, assigned as security for the payment of the note. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff alleges error.

¶2The general finding of the jury is based upon disputed facts and conflicting testimony, and, being approved by the district court, must stand. (K. P. Rly. Co. v. Kunkel, 17 Kas. 145.)

¶3There is nothing substantial in the objection to the rulings of the court on the admission of testimony. Judgment affirmed.

/41/kan/492 · .json · Public domain