Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Kan. App. 2d 435 - State v. Roose

41 Kan. App. 2d 435 - State v. Roose’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Stover · In the Matter of Jensen · Amoco Production Co. v. Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Inc. · In the Interest of B.D.-Y. · In Re Bd-Y.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““knowingly and without authority entering into or remaining within any: “(a) Building, manufactured home, mobile home, tent or other structure which is a dwelling, with intent to commit a felony, theft or sexual battery therein; “(b) building, manufactured home, mobile home, tent or other structure which is not a dwelling, with intent to commit a felony, theft or sexual battery therein; or “(c) motor vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, railroad car or other means of conveyance of persons or property, with intent to commit a felony, theft or sexual battery therein.” (Emphasis added.) K.S.A. 21-3715.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.