Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 MD 601 - Anderson v. Graff

Anderson v. Graff’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2018

5 state decisions

20187518801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the process has been regularly served upon a party..., a strong case must be presented, to justify the [c]ourt in striking out the judgment after the term has passed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It must not be lost sight of, that the process was regularly served upon the appellant as garnishee, by the sheriff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.