41 Md. App. 423 - Leuschner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

38 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1) where the evidence sought to be introduced has an independent source, or 2) the evidence would inevitably have been discovered, or 3) where ‘the connection between the lawless conduct of the police and the discovery of the challenged evidence has become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint’ (quoting Baker v. State, 39 Md.App.133, 140, 383 A.2d 698 (1978)).””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Zimmerman v. State

2. “[t]he trooper ... did not initiate conversation relative to the crime in question. His testimony was that he con ducted no interrogation, no questioning about the crimes about which he was attempting to find information, and in fact the only information that he was able to elicit was that the defendant knew where the bodies were buried.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 62 Md. App. 603 - Hamilton v. State

3. “[W]hen particular grounds for an objection are volunteered or requested by the court, `that party will be limited on appeal to a review of those grounds and will be deemed to have waived any ground not stated.)'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 191 Md. App. 48 - Washington v. State