Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Mich. App. 238 - Conerly v. Liptzen

41 Mich. App. 238 - Conerly v. Liptzen’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2012

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

4019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The occupier is not an insurer of the safety of invitees, and his duty is only to exercise reasonable care for their protection. But the obligation of reasonable care is a full one, applicable in all respects, and extending to everything that threatens the invitee with an unreasonable risk of harm. The occupier must not only use care not to injure the visitor by negligent activities, and warn him of latent dangers of which the occupier knows, but he must also inspect the premises to discover possible dangerous conditions of which he does not know, and take reasonable precautions to protect the invitee from dangers which are foreseeable from the arrangement or use.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'whether, in the light of all of the evidence--circumstantial, direct, or whatsoever it may be, the plaintiff has produced sufficient evidence from which a jury might make a finding of negligence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “what caused her injuries [since] ... mere testimony that the elevator fell was not sufficient to sustain that burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.