Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

41 N.C. 13

Guthrie v. Sorrell's Heirs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1849

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1849-06-05

<p>Cause removed from the Court of Equity of Buncombe County, at the Fall Term 1845.</p> <p>The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion delivered in this Court.</p>

Decided 1849-06-05

Pearson, J.

¶1 This is a bill to redeem a tract of land, which is under mortgage. It was intended to present the very interesting question, whether one, who has taken a deed, absolute upon its face, but with the understanding that it is be a security for certain debts, to be liable to redemption, and who purchases the interest of the mortgagee at execution sale, at the instance of a creditor, not secured by the mortgage, takes an absolute estate, or merely acquires the right to add the amount of his bid to the debts secured by the mortgage l

¶2 This would have been a grave question, and one well worthy of consideration ; but we are not at liberty to entertain it, because the proper parties are not before us.

¶3 In a bill to redeem a mortgage, the personal representative of the mortgagee is a necessary party. He is the person entitled to receive the money, and must necessarily be a party in taking the account.

¶4 The bill must be dismissed for the want of a proper par *14 ty, and, of course, without prejudice, but at the costs of the plaintiff. It has been pending six 3-ears, and it has been in this Court more than three years, awaiting the motion of the parlies.

Per Curiam.

¶5 Bill dismissed.

/41/nc/13 · .json · Public domain