Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 NEB 631 - Shellenberger v. Ransom

Shellenberger v. Ransom’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
17
states following
October 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 1995 · most notably Eversole v. Eversole (1916), Schmeizl v. Schmeizl (1946)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 17 states

8018941900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This is no justification to this court for assuming to supply legislation, the necessity for which has been suggested by subsequent events, but which did not occur to the minds of those legislators by whom our statute of descent was framed. Neither the limitations of the civil law nor the promptings of humanity can be read into a statute from which, without question, they are absent, no matter how desirable the result to be attained may be.” (Page 644.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It would be a reproach to the jurisprudence of the country, if one could recover insurance money payable on the death of a party whose life he had feloniously taken. As well might he recover insurance money upon a building that he had willfully fired.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““When the law is clear and explicit, and its provisions are susceptible of but one interpretation, its consequences, if evil, can only be avoided by a change of the law itself, to be effected by legislative, and not judicial, action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.