41 N.J. Super. 574 - Vanderbeek v. Conlon’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2015
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hartpence v. Grouleff · Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden · 12 N.J. Super. 45 - Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated Transport · Kaufman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. · Lindroth v. Christ Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assuredly an error in instructions of law as against an unsuccessful plaintiff is not prejudicial where he manifestly fails basically to support his alleged cause of action by the facts. Fannick v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 34 N.J. Super. 556, 562 ( App. Div. 1955); Osborne v. Tunis, 25 N.J.L. 633, 649 ( E. & A. 1856); Wyckoff v. Runyon, 33 N.J.L. 107, 109 ( Sup. Ct. 1868). Cf. Leport v. Todd, 32 N.J.L. 124, 133 ( Sup. Ct. 1866). * * * * * * * * In the existing state of the evidence in the present action we are not persuaded that the plaintiffs experienced any denial of substantial justice by reason of any of the errors claimed. R.R. 1:5-3( b ); 2:5.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.