Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 N.M. 341 - Security State Bank v. Clovis Mill & Elevator Co.

Security State Bank v. Clovis Mill & Elevator Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1999

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

401937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basey v. Gallagher · Barnett v. Wedgewood · Higgins v. Cauhape · First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Rogers · Johnson v. Grissard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Appellant contended, and introduced testimony tending to prove, that there was a custom in Curry county at the time the grain in question was bought, for purchasers dealing in grain to rely upon evidence furnished them by mortgagors as to the existence of mortgages on grain crops, so that grain dealers would be protected against buying mortgaged property. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The rule is that a description in the mortgage which, aided by such inquiries as a reasonably prudent man would make under the circumstances and which the mortgage itself indicates, will lead a third person to the information, is sufficient. The description of the crop was not so indefinite as to invalidate the chattel mortgage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"* * * The custom, however, cannot prevail against a statute which requires purchasers of mortgaged property to take notice of such chattel mortgages when filed in the office of the county clerk. A custom will not prevail against a statute or the terms of a contract in conflict with it." * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.