State v. Gennis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The impatience of the learned trial judge with defendant’s demand for 24 hours’ delay can easily be understood. He had been engaged for a week in the trial of other cases growing out of the same labor disturbances and had heard the State’s witnesses give the same testimony repeatedly: Appellant’s attorneys had represented other defendants. All concerned seemed familiar with the facts. However, this was a new cause, bearing a different number on the docket, and the information was a new 'pleading bearing the names of new witnesses. The appellant was entitled to the 24 hours demanded. 16 C.J. 389, 390; Bohannan v. State, 11 Okl.Cr. 69 , 142 P. 1092 ; Dunkin v. State, 45 Okl.Cr. 203 , 282 P. 692 ; State v. Jensen, 83 Utah 452 , 30 P.2d 203 ; State v. DeWolfe, 29 Mont. 415 , 74 P. 1084 .””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Salhus

2. ““ * * * a defendant may waive his right to be furnished with a copy of the information, and if he fails to demand the 24 hours’ delay the validity of subsequent proceedings could not be questioned on that ground.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Slayton

3. ““A failure to furnish such copy shall not affect the validity of any subsequent proceedings against the defendant if he pleads to the indictment or information.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Slayton