41 Ohio App. 3d 113 - Fish v. Ford Motor Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · 8 Wash. App. 347 - Calkins v. Boeing Company · Lamb v. Thieme · 85 Cal. App. 3d 969 - Lisec v. United Air Lines, Inc. · Milich v. Schenley Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I agree that any decision made by my employer regarding eligibility, adoption, rejection, award or commendation with reference to my idea shall be final and binding, and that my employer shall have the right to withdraw or change the program at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.