41 Ohio App. 3d 163 - State v. Lundy’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
79 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably 97 Ohio App. 3d 693 - Tschantz v. Ferguson (1994), State v. Roseberry (2011)
79 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Chambers v. Mississippi · Brown v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one. (B) Where the defendant's conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct results in two or more offenses of the same or similar kind committed separately or with a separate animus as to each, the *Page 10 indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, and the defendant may be convicted of all of them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““(A) Effect of Erroneous Ruling. Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected, and “(1) Objection. In case the ruling is one admitting evidence, a timely objection or motion to strike appears of record, stating the specific ground of objection, if the specific ground was not apparent from the context; or “(2) Offer of proof. In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 10 , Article I of the Ohio Constitution protect a defendant from being put in jeopardy twice for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.