Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Ohio App. 3d 233 - Haehnlein v. Henry

41 Ohio App. 3d 233 - Haehnlein v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably 42 Ohio App. 3d 6 - Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (1988), 91 Ohio App. 3d 389 - Greynolds v. Kurman (1993)

34 state decisions

12019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fernandez v. Chardon · Staff Builders, Inc. v. Armstrong · Tennessee Consolidated Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America · Skillin v. Kimball · Cundiff v. Washburn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “then the trial judge has an opportunity to correct such inconsistency by: `1. returning the jury for further consideration of its answer; 2. entering judgment in accordance with the answer; or 3. ordering a new trial'.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`promote[s] the efficiency of trials by permitting reconciliation of inconsistencies without the need for a new presentation of the evidence to a different trier[,]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “any other decision would encourage jury shopping by litigants, who might preclude resubmission of the verdict merely by waiting to object until after the original jury is discharged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.