Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Ohio App. 3d 306 - State v. Ferguson

41 Ohio App. 3d 306 - State v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
5
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 71 Ohio App. 3d 292 - State v. Logan (1991), Brooks v. State (1993)

51 state decisions

16019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santoni v. United States · 46 Ill. App. 3d 195 - People v. Daily · Pittman v. State · 37 Misc. 2d 386 - People v. Esposito · 21 Ariz. App. 388 - Rockmore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here an inmate in a penal institution has made a diligent, good-faith effort to call to the attention of the proper authorities in another state that he desires a charge pending against him in that state disposed of, by trial or dismissal, he is entitled to have such request acted upon. The failure of the authorities to do so constitutes the denial of a speedy trial”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer's jurisdiction written notice of the place of his imprisonment and his request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment, information or complaint * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““[TJhere is first a burden on the defendant to substantially comply with the IAD request requirements by doing everything that could reasonably be expected. Once the defendant fulfills this burden, however, the burden is then placed upon the states to cooperate and bring the accused to trial within one hundred eighty days.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.