Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Ohio App. 3d 313 - State v. Scott

41 Ohio App. 3d 313 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Gumm (1995), State v. Grant (1993)

44 state decisions

26019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Neil v. Biggers · United States v. Agurs · Stovall v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An indigent defendant who seeks state funded expert assistance bears the burden of establishing a reasonable necessity for such assistance, and 'undeveloped assertions that the proposed assistance would be useful to the defense are patently inadequate.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the evidence fails to establish that the defendant was elsewhere, such failure does not create an inference that the defendant was present at the time when and at the place where an offense may have been committed. If after a consideration of the evidence of alibi, along with all the evidence, you are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was present at the time in question, you must return a verdict of not guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1) The value of the expert assistance to the defendant's proper representation; and,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.