Sease v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1985
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The County Office failed to get, interpret, or apply appropriately the facts about the situation of the client. (2) The client fulfilled his obligation for reporting to the best of his ability. (3) The client could not have been expected to know that his grant was more than he was eligible to receive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.